Connect with us

Politics

State lawmakers push to protect girls from competing against biological males in sports

Published

on

In recent years, state lawmakers in the United States have been pushing for laws that aim to protect girls from competing against biological males in sports. The basis for these laws is the belief that allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports can put female athletes at a physical disadvantage and undermine the integrity of women’s sports.

These laws typically require that athletes compete in sports based on their biological sex, as determined by their chromosomes or reproductive anatomy. Some states have also implemented hormone testing or other measures to ensure that athletes are competing in the appropriate category.

Proponents of these laws argue that they are necessary to ensure fair competition and protect the rights of female athletes. They argue that biological males have inherent physical advantages, such as greater muscle mass and strength, which can give them an unfair advantage in women’s sports.

Opponents, however, argue that these laws are discriminatory and can harm transgender athletes who may not identify with the sex they were assigned at birth. They also argue that these laws are not necessary, as transgender athletes are already subject to strict rules and regulations under the International Olympic Committee and other sports organizations.

Overall, the debate around laws to protect girls from competing against biological males in sports is a complex and controversial issue. Supporters argue that it is necessary to maintain fair competition and protect the rights of female athletes, while opponents argue that it is discriminatory and can harm transgender athletes.

Several states in the United States have passed laws or proposed legislation that would restrict the participation of transgender athletes in sports. These include:

  • Alabama: In 2021, Alabama passed a law that prohibits transgender athletes from competing on teams that do not match their biological sex.
  • Arkansas: In 2021, Arkansas passed a law that prohibits transgender athletes from competing on teams that do not match their biological sex.
  • Idaho: In 2020, Idaho passed a law, known as the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act, that prohibits transgender athletes from competing on teams that do not match their biological sex.
  • Tennessee: In 2021, Tennessee passed a law that requires middle and high school student-athletes to compete in sports based on their biological sex, as determined by their chromosomes or reproductive anatomy.
  • Mississippi: In 2021, Mississippi passed a bill that prohibits transgender athletes from competing on teams that do not match their biological sex.
  • South Dakota: In 2020, the South Dakota Governor signed a bill that requires student-athletes to participate in sports based on their sex at birth.
  • Texas: In 2021, Texas proposed a bill that would require schools to designate sports teams based on the biological sex of athletes, as determined by their birth certificate.

These laws are still subject to change and can be challenged in court, and it’s important to note that laws and regulations in this area are subject to change. The situation can also be different depending on the school district or local level.

Continue Reading

Politics

FBI Won’t Say If It’s Investigating Self-Declared ‘Hamas’ Terrorists Protesting At U.S. Universities

Published

on

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) would not say Tuesday whether it is investigating people identifying themselves as part of a foreign terrorist organization heard chanting “We are Hamas” outside U.S. universities including Columbia.

Video footage shows masked Islamists taunting Jewish students outside of President Barack Obama’s alma mater. One woman shouted at a pro-Israel activist, “We are Hamas” while standing outside Columbia University. “We’re all Hamas.”

Another man who covered his face was seen on video promising more mass slaughter, rape, and kidnapping: “Remember the 7th of October! That will happen not one more time, not five more times, to 10 more times, not 100 more times, not 1,000 more times, but 10,000 times!”

“Never forget the 7th of October. That will happen not one more time, not five more times, not 10…100…1000…10,000…The 7th of October is going to be every day for you.”

Protestors screamed this at two Jewish @Columbia students right outside campus gates tonight. pic.twitter.com/VYp0tFudGj

— Jonas Du (@jonasydu) April 19, 2024

“Never forget the 7th of October,” another unidentifiable man donning the Palestinian flag outside the university screams in a video recording. “Are you ready? Seventh of October is about to be every day. Every day. Seventh of October is going to be every day for you.”

The Federalist asked the FBI whether they would investigate the self-proclaimed terrorists.

“Thank you for your inquiry. However, we decline comment on this matter,” the bureau replied.

The FBI designates Hamas as a terrorist

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

To The Ivy League Palestine Supporters: Welcome To The ‘Eat Dirt’ Club

Published

on

A lot of congressional Republicans see a political slam dunk in thrusting their focus into the thick of anti-Israel protests raging at Ivy League campuses across the country, but to the protesters, there’s only one thing to say: This is what disappointment feels like. Get used to it.

Participants in the protests are demanding a range of things, from a simple “cease fire” in Gaza to something resembling more of what you might call a “final solution” in Israel. Republicans and Fox News are taking a special interest in the affair because of course all of the protesters are Democrat voters, and some of them are proudly allowing their anti-Jew flag to fly.

That makes things a little uncomfortable for the White House and Democrats in Congress, but so far, Joe Biden and Co. are managing to tolerate it. That’s because, with a giddy assist from Republicans, Democrats are within a baby’s breath of passing a nearly $100 billion foreign welfare package, about a quarter of which will go to Israel to continue its war campaign. Included in that portion is some “humanitarian aid” for Palestinians. (Enjoy!)

What’s not included in that handsome giveaway is anything of note that would directly improve the life of a single American on U.S. soil. There was nothing related to the collapse of the Southern border, nothing to address crime, and nothing to bring down the cost of groceries or the price of gas.

So the anti-Israel faction of the Democrat Party feels

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Politics

8 GOP States (And Counting) Ban Biden’s DOJ From ‘Intimidating’ Voters At 2024 Polls

Published

on

Florida and Missouri refused requests from the Department of Justice (DOJ) to place federal election monitors inside polling locations during the 2022 elections, arguing doing so would be tantamount to federal voter intimidation. The Federalist inquired with other Republican-led states whether they would take a similar stance should the DOJ make the same requests — but not all appeared willing to stand up to Biden’s weaponized agency.

The DOJ announced in 2022 it would send election monitors to 64 jurisdictions across the nation to monitor alleged voter intimidation and threats. Several Florida counties were included in the DOJ’s list, but Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis refused DOJ election monitors to enter polling sites in South Florida, arguing DOJ’s involvement would be “counterproductive” and “potentially undermine confidence in the election.”

“Florida statutes list the people who ‘may enter any polling room or polling place,’” Chief Counsel for the Florida Department of State Brad McVay wrote in a letter. The Department of State is overseen by DeSantis. “Department of Justice personnel are not included on the list.”

The DOJ “couldn’t provide a reason to be [at the polling places], nor any statutory authority for them to be there,” Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd stated in a letter, according to Politico.

Missouri took a similar stance in 2022, arguing the DOJ’s presence was akin to bullying local election authorities. State authorities suggested the DOJ should instead contact the secretary of state’s office to discuss any election issues.

Ahead of November, The

CLICK HERE to read the rest of this ARTICLE. This post was originally published on another website.

Continue Reading

Trending